Showing posts with label rant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rant. Show all posts

Monday, September 24, 2012

What are you all so worried about – it’s easy!

I really should stop reading most things on the internet about screenwriting. A lot of it is not so much fiction as science fiction. Sure, there are useful resources online but [expletive deleted] me you have to trawl through some [censored]ing crap.

Take for example this gem I found on a film networking page:

“Writing a treatment is very-very-very easy!”

Really?

Not your garden variety ‘very easy’ where you knock out a “3-5 pager” before a cup of tea and a scone.

Not the slightly rarer ‘very, very easy’ where you’re doodling in a notebook and, hey presto, you’ve accidentally written a treatment (framed by a lovely floral doodle).

No, this is the ‘very, very, very easy’ phenomenon where you fall out of bed and, oh my god, there’s a treatment just sitting there on the floor… or you open the fridge door and look, a treatment at the back next to the six pack of tinnies!

Intrigued beyond words at this exciting new discovery I eagerly read on. A quick scan of the ensuing pitch told me how to set a treatment out on the page – double spacing you say? - and what went where like an Ikea instruction manual. So if it’s a three page treatment (I’d call that a synopsis but hey, whatever) the first page is the first act, the second the second and there’s a prize if you can correctly guess what the third page is. Genius!

Okay. Let’s do this then!!!

*Fingers poised above the keyboard*

Ummmm.

I suppose I might need a few other things.

Like a great, original idea for a film. A premise? A theme maybe? Oh, I know, some compelling characters. Yep, need those. Plot? Something to say? Rising action and stakes? Wants, needs, flaws. Character arcs.  A kick-arse climax and satisfying conclusion.

Hmmmmm.

Not seeing any of this in my very-very-very easy treatment writing discourse. If I start typing in double spaced Courier 12 font it will no doubt come to me…

It’s like telling me anyone can make a car. All you need is an engine, four wheels, a steering wheel… maybe some doors… oh, oh, oh, those drink holder thingies… and a sunroof… and what’s that gadget that does the thing with the thing? One of those!

Someone commented on the original post in response to my scepticism (who’d have thought?) that “physically” it’s easy to write a treatment. I guess so – you depress the keys in a downwards motion using your fingertips and words magically appear on a white space commonly known as a screen.

Come on!!! Writing a treatment is very, very, very easy? [Expletive deleted][Censored][Under review at the Classification Review Board] you!

Coming up with an original, compelling, entertaining idea for a feature film is HARD! There are courses now being run over east about how to write a proper LOGLINE – one sentence! Because, going by most funding body screeds of projects in development, we pretty much suck at it.

But what troubles me most is this – the dismissive nature of what it is screenwriters do.  Of course it’s easy! Anyone can do it! They’re only words! Knock out one of those out no probs! Which leads us here.

There are several types of writing that not all writers are good at – scripted scenes are different to a one page synopsis which is different to writing a full blown treatment. Don’t only give me a mechanical, dry recitation of the ‘geometry’ – inspire people to come up with good ideas; to recognise and discard bad ones; to work at their craft; to show respect for that craft. Celebrate good writing. Don’t trivialise it. And don’t ever, ever disrespect what it is screenwriters struggle to do – bring worlds and characters to life using only words, imagination, and bloody-minded commitment. None of that is easy. Not even for the most celebrated of writers.

Otherwise, it’s very-very-very easy for me to dismiss you as just another [censored].

"I love writing but hate starting. The page is awfully white and it says, “You may have fooled some of the people some of the time but those days are over, giftless. I’m not your agent and I’m not your mommy. I’m a white piece of paper, you wanna dance with me?” And I really, really don’t." 

- Aaron Sorkin

Saturday, September 17, 2011

The "Re" Factor - An analogy (and quick rant)

Yes, remakes, reboots and re-imaginings. The bane of Hollywood at the moment. For example, how many Super & Spider Men do I need in my cinematic world? Problem is, audiences flock to go see them. I struggle to understand why...

Then I noticed a certain phenomena on Facebook: status updates that are cut and pastes from various comedy websites - without quotation marks or attribution (writers have a word for that but let's not go there) - thereby appearing to be the poster's own creation. Which is met with much acclaim and adulation. Oh, how hilarious the poster is! How witty! Likes and comments up the wazoo.

Zero creativity for maximum response.

I used to be notorious (until most of my offending friends took the hint) for berating people who forwarded recycled crap off the internet to my personal email. "Dazzle me with your own wit and brilliance" used to be my plea! I guess none of my friends' surnames end in Christopher Nolan.

Social Media appears to have increased the practice exponentially. But can you blame the poster? They get the response they want with minimum effort.

Isn't that what the big Hollywood studios are doing? Recycling old product in a slightly different guise? Of course they'll keep doing it if people keep paying their hard earned over the counter. Same as hitting that "Like" button. Why go to the trouble (and expense) of creating something new and original?

Drives me nuts as someone who tries to create new and original content (in both mediums) but it seems to be the way of the world these days - the quick, easy fix.

Rant over as I type '"today's funniest jokes" into the google machine...

Friday, April 9, 2010

Emergence

Australia's great war-time Prime Minister, John Curtin, controversially uttered the following words in 1941 that set the course for this nation to the present day:

Without any inhibitions of any kind, I make it clear that Australia looks to America, free of any pangs as to our traditional links or kinship with the United Kingdom.

What reminded me of this rare example of Australian oratory is my impending participation in a screenwriting course with an American instructor. And damn it, I'm excited!

What John Curtin would make of a course conducted over two continents using Skype is anyone's guess but let me reiterate my position by mangling the former PM's words:

Without any inhibitions of any kind, I make it clear that I look to America, free of any pangs as to traditional notions of Australian storytelling paradigms or so-called cultural imperatives.

I've never understood what "telling Australian stories" actually means other than I am an Australian writer and this might influence how I see the world. It certainly has never meant, to me, what I suspect that phrase is code for ... "Hollywood bad". Sure, America makes some dreadful movies ... they also, when they get it right, make superlative films, the best in the world.

So I look forward to having my humble efforts pulled apart and examined and challenged and reconstructed by what I consider world's best practice.

Like in Curtin's time that might be a controversial position to take - though there are signs that the inward looking cinema of urban suffering and outback cliche is waning - but it's one that will set my future course as well, critics be damned!

Saturday, March 20, 2010

I will not write your fucking script for free!

I don't know how actors stand it in this town. Pretty much every casting call I see on a proliferation of social media sites is for unpaid acting roles. Apparently, if you get the role you get the roll ... chicken & salad that is - lovingly made by the director's mother ... oh, and something to add to your show reel. Bonus!

There are professional casting agencies in Perth who supplement work in TVC's with paid acting roles in productions such as Cloud Street, Lockie Leonard and low budget features. But the number of unpaid gigs outside of this is quite staggering. Unfortunately, there will always be someone who takes the role for free but when is enough enough? How much "free catering" can one bear when you've undoubtedly spent time, energy and money honing your craft? What about those actors who actually value their talent and lose roles to lesser actors because they dare think they deserve to be remunerated properly? How does the local film industry elevate itself from the cottage variety to a serious ongoing concern when this activity constantly undercuts that ambition?

It's the same in the world of screenwriting.

I went to a screening of short films last year where I was introduced to a "producer". This person pitched me a feature film project where there would be a committee of writers, "US style", who would rewrite each others work. Supposedly this script would be for 4 actors from a well known HBO series who would come to Australia for the shoot (to be directed by a local with no feature film experience). With their New York accents and style of speech.

Putting aside the sheer implausibility of this actually happening, when I inquired as to the fee for my participation I was told there was no money. When I mentioned the potential problem of Australians writing authentic dialogue for New York actors, I was reassured there was none. When I asked about how this committee of writers would work and the thorny notion of credits etc this wasn't even a consideration.

He then had the gall to ask me for a writing sample! Now, I'm generally a pretty level-headed guy and, for reasons past understanding, gave him my business card and wandered off saying I'd think about it (I subsequently emailed him the next day to pass). What I should have said is, "are you fucking insane?"

I used to get a lot of requests from actors asking for scenes/monologues or directors looking for short film scripts. Some people are now starting to offer money for these services and if I like the person, have the time, and/or respond to the suggested project I will get involved. The fact that they offer to pay for my skills, even if it may not be at a proper commercial rate, is appreciated and respected. They treat me like a professional not just some schmuck they can get a script for free from so they can cast a whole lot of free actors, not pay a crew and call on mum's catering skills.

But when I now mention this whole 'being paid thing' it's amazing how many people you never hear from again. I mean, seriously, do you think I will stop working on my feature projects so that I can do something for you for nothing? People also seem to think a good script is dashed off in a couple of hours. Time is an absolute invaluable resource for a writer. I have even turned down these sorts of paid gigs because either I don't have the time to do it justice or I don't think my style suits the brief.

So please do take offence when I say I won't write your fucking script for free. This isn't a hobby, it's not some sheltered workshop. Films cost money to make and part of that is paying actors and writers and treating them as professionals. If you want to make something for YouTube then knock yourself out with your mates. If you want to make a film then come at me with more than fantasy casting or "this director will get to see your work" or appeals to my altruistic nature. In this matter I have none!

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Another Rant - Writers as Sport

The more I think about it, the more this really bugs me. The Bitter Script Reader is asking for people to submit what they know to be a bad script so that he can publicly eviscerate the writer for a little sport and notoriety. The only comeback being an interview so that poor Joe Schmuck can plead he is a changed writer, "really I am ... honest!"

Except the only thing anybody will ever remember is, "Joe Schmuck, wasn't he that guy who wrote that goddamn awful script that was torn apart on the web. Yeah, think we'll pass on him."

The whole idea shows a stunning lack of respect for writers, especially those who may not know any better. Why would you ever knowingly put something out there that is bad? Especially when the nature of the review will guarantee it spreads like wildfire throughout the net?

So, no thanks. I won't send you a crappy script so you can have a little sport at my expense ... that's what family and non-film friends are for!

Monday, February 1, 2010

A Quick Rant

That's like the third tweet, blog, post in a row today where the first screenwriting "rule" listed is formatting (and grammar) with in depth discussion about font sizes and brads and coloured script covers or not.

Are you all out of your ****ing minds?!

How about, "is my idea strong enough for a movie?" How about, "who is my main character and what is his/her story and how do I best tell it?" How about, "what am I trying to say that might actually engage an audience of paying strangers for two hours?"

Tab indentations and thickness of card stock? Yeah, that's really what I need to be thinking about.

"Hey, I have this GREAT idea for a feature script with this utterly compelling, flawed character who goes on this cool arc by doing [x], [y], and [z] which is like really difficult because of this wicked nemesis and ... what? Oh! Yes, I was going to use a Blue cover ... and Courier 12 point font ... yep, absolutely, I'm measuring the brad lengths now ... pardon? What's my story? ****! I've forgotten ..."

Don't EVER tell me the first rule of screenwriting is ****ing formatting. That's the EASY part. If in doubt go buy Final Draft (shameless plug in the vain hope of free upgrades). Try concentrating on what your damn story is and who your characters are and why anyone should care. THAT is the hard part.

ps apologies if the font, colour, or general composition of this blog post does not meet legislated regulatory standards ...