Showing posts with label Archangel Pictures. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Archangel Pictures. Show all posts

Sunday, July 21, 2013

Turbulence Update or We will, we will rock you!

A lot has happened in a very short period of time. Namely this:

Director: I hate the title. Why can’t you come up with a better title? We really need to change the title! Have you changed the title yet?

Me: I actually quite like it.

Director: It sucks. It’s terrible. I hate it. Have you SEEN the Ray Liotta film of the same name?

Me: We’re not remaking that film.

Director: It makes it sound like the whole thing is set on a plane.

Me: Well, it starts on a plane…

Director: Yes, yes, I know. But does it end on a plane? Well, does it?

Me: It’s a thematic title. Our main character’s world is rocked. Get it… rocked. Like in turbulence (does shimmy action to demonstrate the point).

Director: Did I mention… I. HATE. IT?!!!!!!

Me: Do you want me to get the feedback sheets from the reading and tell you what the audience thought?

Director: We need a new title!

Me: Sixty one percent liked it. If this were a Federal election every single seat would be won by the Opposition. It’s a landslide!!!

Director: Oh, so now it’s set on a mountain, is it?

Okay, in fairness to Tim the conversation didn’t quite go like that and yes, for the record, the Ray Liotta film sucks.

However, in the space of one week, we now have producers on board and they will be taking the project to market as part of the Melbourne International Film Festival next week. How did this all happen?

Dissolve to flashback:

There I was sitting in a music room at Leederville TAFE having been browbeaten by Tim to attend a ScreenWest industry briefing… on FAQs and website navigation.

Me (Voice-over): Why am I sitting in a music room listening to people talk about FAQs? What even is an FAQ? I should look that up. I wonder if there’s a website?

A revamped funding initiative – Feature Navigator – was fast approaching and we were looking for a producer. Determined not to drink free booze and eat free food paid by our taxpayer’s money, Tim insisted we flee instead to deepest, darkest Oxford Street to discuss projects and strategy. A list of prospective producers was made, most of whom were drinking free booze and eating free food while I munched on my decidedly not free Chicken and Cashews at Hans CafĂ©.

Yes, for the purposes of this post, Tim is the villain while I will be your hero and amiable narrator. I expect I will pay for this is no small measure later in proceedings. Insert smiley emoticon J to denote humour and general plea for clemency.

The very next day (a Thursday) I had coffee with a previous collaborator Chris Richards-Scully to touch base and sound him out about Feature Navigator. Chris and his producing partner, Michael Facey (who I’ve also worked with), formed Archangel Pictures back in 2009.

Chris immediately expressed an interest in Turbulence so the discussion was twofold: Tim and I teaming up with Archangel Pictures to submit feature film projects for the Feature Navigator (FN) round; and the possibility of Archangel producing Turbulence.

Chris sounded out Michael; I spoke to Tim, and a meeting was set for Saturday lunchtime. Something kept nagging me about this day but everything was set. Then I remembered… it was my birthday!

The meeting took place (hey, I’m a professional) but Chris was unfortunately unable to attend. We agreed to discuss projects for FN and to send Michael and Chris the reading draft of Turbulence. The script was sent out later that day, early afternoon-ish, and I went off to get spoilt by mum’s home cooking.

I get a call the next day, not more than 24 hours later, and Chris and Michael have both read the script, love it, and want to option it!

Options and agreements and lawyers notes ensue. The following Thursday evening the four of us meet, clarifications are sought and made, and we reach an in principle agreement that Archangel Pictures will produce Turbulence and pitch it at market in Melbourne. The final paperwork is to be signed but this is a promising step. We also agree on the three projects we will submit for the FN round.

Everything is in place… except for this:

Producer: So, about this title…?

Me: Arrrrggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!

Monday, July 18, 2011

Update aka The Long and the Short of It, Part 1

Screenwriting is, of course, a very glamorous occupation where you get to party with fabulously talented actors, hang out with visionary directors and be wooed by humble and respectful producers. Then there's the late night chat show circuit, the yacht at Cannes and the huge royalty cheques in the mail. Just as well those high concept scripts write themselves... I mean, when would you find the time? To sit for hours on end... by yourself... writing and rewriting and rewriting some more. Sounds awful.

Ah, it's a pleasant fantasy. So, what the hell, let's continue with it:

CHAT SHOW HOST: So Richard, what's been happening since you were here last?
ME: You want the long or the short of it?
CHS: Do we need the seven second delay again? 
ME: Settle down. 
CHS: I'm saying, this is a family show.
ME: Since when? 
CHS: Okay, it's not but last time you were here you dumped all over the funding bodies.
ME: No, that was Burleigh. 
CHS: Told a film critic to *beep* off.
ME: That was Jimmy.
CHS: Recounted the last time you were *beeped* with your pants on.
ME: Okay, I'll give you that one, that was definitely me. 
CHS: Any good news?
ME: Well, I had to shelve a short film script.
CHS: That's good?
ME: No, that's terrible.
CHS: What happened?
ME: I had a director all lined up. Wasn't eligible for funding. Found another director who may have been. Then a producer came on board who could have been. 
CHS: Should have all been fine then...
ME: Yeah, except director number two pulled out.
CHS: Prematurely?
ME: I thought you said this was a family show?
CHS: I lied.
ME: The script was sent out to a couple more directors who liked it but said they didn't connect with it.
CHS: What does that mean? 
ME: They didn't know how to tell the producer they thought it was *beeeeeeeep*
CHS: Is it?
ME: No, not at all. But there were no takers before the deadline so now it sits gathering dust on my computer.
CHS: You really should dust your computer regularly. I'm serious. Plays havoc with the fan which overheats the hard drive which causes--
ME: It's in a drawer.
CHS: On your computer?
ME: Anyway, there's another short script.
CHS: How's this one going?
ME: Yeah, really good. It's a result of this and some of this.
CHS: You workshopped the idea with actors?
ME: No, the idea came out of improvised scenes performed by the actors.
CHS: That's a bit pedantic, isn't it?
ME: So sue me, I'm a writer. 
CHS: Big royalty cheques?
ME: *Beep* you!
CHS: Okay, you write this script from various improvised scenes... 
ME: Then the actors workshop the draft. 
CHS: And make changes?
ME: Sure.
CHS: That doesn't make your head explode?
ME: They didn't scribble all over it in crayon.
CHS: Still...
ME: I had a couple of quibbles but they didn't change the structure. Not at all. So I was fine with it.
CHS: That's very mature of you.
ME: Thank you. They even added an extra twist. 
CHS: The butler did it?
ME: No, the uncle. But that wasn't the twist.
CHS: What was the twist?
ME: You'll have to sleep on it.
CHS: Was that an in-joke?
ME: You bet! 
CHS: What happens now?
ME: You show clips of my past films and the audience applauds?
CHS: No, I meant with this script.
ME: I sent it to a director I work with.
CHS: Eligible?
ME: Not since the last time I checked.
CHS: It's the same director from the other script? 
ME: The one in the drawer?
CHS: Yes.
ME: He has, in fact, agreed to direct it. 
CHS: What about government funding?
ME: Don't need it. Why? One word... co-production.
CHS: Is that really one word? 
ME: Now who's being pedantic?
CHS: It is my show. 
ME: Granted. But these two parties, here and here, are going to make this little baby come to life.
CHS: It's currently a dead baby?
ME: I was talking metaphorically.
CHS: Sounds like it's literally a done deal. 
ME: Apparently they met today.
CHS: How'd that go?
ME: How would I know? I'm only the writer.
CHS: I'm out of questions. 
ME: Just as well. I was starting to think you were some sort of clunky writer's device.
CHS: Thought it would make a nice change around here.
ME: Okay, now it sounds like you're simply parroting the thoughts of the writer.
CHS: Is that so bad?
ME: Say goodnight Richard.
CHS: Good night, Richard.
JG: And that's how the Q&A went down. Remember to hit the subscribe button on iTunes and--
ME: That's enough inside references, Jeff. Okay?

To be continued...